John Haller’s Prophecy Update
SMOU Chaos
Harbinger’s Daily
By Robert Gottselig: I remember the day well, when a confused man approached my Friends of Israel Gospel Ministry literature table at a prophecy conference we were invited to, and point blank asked me, “How can you believe any of this?”
He then began pointing to all the different book tables set up by the different ministries and proceeded to tell me what he was struggling with. You see, even though he had not read the books represented, he assumed we all had major differences of opinion regarding the end times (eschatology). In his mind, how could anyone believe any of it?
The Problem of Misinterpretation
After several minutes of discussion, I realized that he had for years been studying different authors who were not dispensationalists. Instead, he had fallen for the teachings of those whose hermeneutic (method of interpreting the Bible) was not to interpret the Bible in a literal, grammatical, historical way. But rather their approach was to look at the Bible in an allegorical and spiritual way. No wonder this man was so confused, as that method of interpretation leads to nothing more than confusion, especially in regard to eschatology.
Charles Ryrie in his book Basic Theology says it well: “If used consistently, allegorical hermeneutics would reduce the Bible to near-fiction, for the normal meaning of words would be irrelevant and would be replaced by whatever meaning the interpreter gives to the symbols. However, for the most part, allegorical hermeneutics is not practiced consistently or thoroughly. Evangelicals who use this system do so usually in the area of prophecy, while using normal or literal hermeneutics in other areas of biblical Interpretation.”
It is amazing that so many Christians who interpret God’s Word literally concerning Jesus’ First Coming now shift gears in the way they read their Bibles concerning events linked to His Second Coming. Such was the case with a former pastor who would expositionally preach a good sermon until he came to Bible prophecy. Because for him, modern-day Israel meant nothing. There was no Rapture, no literal Tribulation Period, Jesus was not coming back literally with two feet planted on the Mount of Olives, and thus no literal 1,000-year Kingdom. Where does it end? How do you decide what to take literally and what not to?
He then began pointing to all the different book tables set up by the different ministries and proceeded to tell me what he was struggling with. You see, even though he had not read the books represented, he assumed we all had major differences of opinion regarding the end times (eschatology). In his mind, how could anyone believe any of it?
After several minutes of discussion, I realized that he had for years been studying different authors who were not dispensationalists. Instead, he had fallen for the teachings of those whose hermeneutic (method of interpreting the Bible) was not to interpret the Bible in a literal, grammatical, historical way. But rather their approach was to look at the Bible in an allegorical and spiritual way. No wonder this man was so confused, as that method of interpretation leads to nothing more than confusion, especially in regard to eschatology.
Charles Ryrie in his book Basic Theology says it well: “If used consistently, allegorical hermeneutics would reduce the Bible to near-fiction, for the normal meaning of words would be irrelevant and would be replaced by whatever meaning the interpreter gives to the symbols. However, for the most part, allegorical hermeneutics is not practiced consistently or thoroughly. Evangelicals who use this system do so usually in the area of prophecy, while using normal or literal hermeneutics in other areas of biblical Interpretation.”
It is amazing that so many Christians who interpret God’s Word literally concerning Jesus’ First Coming now shift gears in the way they read their Bibles concerning events linked to His Second Coming. Such was the case with a former pastor who would expositionally preach a good sermon until he came to Bible prophecy. Because for him, modern-day Israel meant nothing. There was no Rapture, no literal Tribulation Period, Jesus was not coming back literally with two feet planted on the Mount of Olives, and thus no literal 1,000-year Kingdom. Where does it end? How do you decide what to take literally and what not to?
Prophecy News Watch
By PNW Staff: The election of Washington, D.C. Councilmember Janeese Lewis George as the Democratic nominee for mayor is likely to become another flashpoint in the ongoing debate over the direction of the American left.
George's victory is significant not simply because of who she is, but because of what she represents. A member of the Democratic Socialists of America, she comes from a movement that openly advocates policies far beyond what many Americans would consider mainstream liberalism. While some voters may see these ideas as compassionate and forward-thinking, others view them as a warning sign of where progressive politics ultimately leads.
For many conservatives, the race serves as a reminder that the ideological shift within the Democratic Party is not slowing down—it is accelerating.
The Democratic Party of the 1990s under Bill Clinton embraced tougher crime policies, welfare reform, and stronger immigration enforcement. Today's party often takes very different positions on those same issues. Whether one views that change as progress or decline largely depends on political perspective, but the shift itself is difficult to deny.
George's victory is significant not simply because of who she is, but because of what she represents. A member of the Democratic Socialists of America, she comes from a movement that openly advocates policies far beyond what many Americans would consider mainstream liberalism. While some voters may see these ideas as compassionate and forward-thinking, others view them as a warning sign of where progressive politics ultimately leads.
For many conservatives, the race serves as a reminder that the ideological shift within the Democratic Party is not slowing down—it is accelerating.
The Democratic Party of the 1990s under Bill Clinton embraced tougher crime policies, welfare reform, and stronger immigration enforcement. Today's party often takes very different positions on those same issues. Whether one views that change as progress or decline largely depends on political perspective, but the shift itself is difficult to deny.
Front Page Magazine
By Daniel Greenfield: Every recent foreign policy disaster in the middle east seems to start with Qatar “helping us”.
There was Qatar “helping us” negotiate with the Taliban, helping us negotiate with Hamas and then helping us negotiate with Iran and find lots of cash for it.
Some cynical conspiracy types might say that Qatar, the state sponsor of the Muslim Brotherhood, which harbored Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11, isn’t really helping us, but using its useful idiots to destroy us… but that can’t be true.
After all look here, Qatar is helping Iran get hold of $100 billion which it will surely use to provide humanitarian aid. Especially the radioactive aid. And the aid that plant bombs. And the aid that can be fired at high speed.
There was Qatar “helping us” negotiate with the Taliban, helping us negotiate with Hamas and then helping us negotiate with Iran and find lots of cash for it.
Some cynical conspiracy types might say that Qatar, the state sponsor of the Muslim Brotherhood, which harbored Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11, isn’t really helping us, but using its useful idiots to destroy us… but that can’t be true.
After all look here, Qatar is helping Iran get hold of $100 billion which it will surely use to provide humanitarian aid. Especially the radioactive aid. And the aid that plant bombs. And the aid that can be fired at high speed.
Geller Report
By Pamela Geller: It’s sickening that Linda Sarsour, who has insisted that “shariah law is reasonable and once you read into the details it makes a lot of sense,” and that “nothing is creepier than Zionism,” and who has called for jihad against both the U.S. government and against Donald Trump in particular, emerged as a major player within the Mamdani campaign and is now feeling emboldened.
Jihad Watch
By Daniel Greenfield: We’ve been covering IRS abuses for a long time and while it’s gone after conservative, Christian and Jewish groups, it’s allowed leftist and Islamist groups to go on operating.
This may be the most extreme example yet.
This may be the most extreme example yet.
The Justice Department today announced the unsealing of a five-count complaint charging Reda Mazen Rida Sabassi, 38, of San Diego, California, with terrorism, sanctions-evasion, wire fraud, money laundering, and false statement charges in connection with his efforts to divert funds raised through purported charitable campaigns to Hamas and for personal use.That’s not the strange part of this.
Since at least in or about 2022, Sabassi has used his social media accounts, crowdfunding websites, and his putative charity called Ikram — The Arab Charity Foundation Inc. (Ikram) to solicit donations from around the world, including from individuals in the United States and New York. In his online fundraising campaigns, Sabassi claimed to be raising funds to provide humanitarian aid to people in Gaza; however, Sabassi was actually raising funds for Hamas. Sabassi and a co-conspirator joked privately that they should name the fundraiser after Hamas’s al-Qassam Brigades, before agreeing to use Sabassi’s Ikram. Sabassi worked with the Hamas fundraising organization Gaza Now and other co-conspirators to operate these online fundraisers and to send funds to Hamas.*** Between in or about December 2023 and in or about February 2024, Sabassi raised a total of approximately $600,000 through online fundraising campaigns, from which Sabassi sent approximately $116,000 to a Hamas member and attempted to convert approximately $382,000 of the cash he raised into cryptocurrency to send to Hamas through Gaza Now.
Paul McGuire
Everything Is Changing Rapidly
About: Join Internationally Recognized Prophecy Expert, Minister, Speaker and Author, Paul McGuire as he analyzes current events through the lens of Bible Prophecy.
L.A. Marzulli
Lights In The Sky!
Great UFO footage!
Great UFO footage!
Lisa Haven
It Must Be Bad…
Trump Promised The “Report,”
Then Buried It
Trump Promised The “Report,”
Then Buried It
Synopsis: Trump, the White House, ODNI, Tulsi Gabbard, and voting machine security are now at the center of a delayed election report raising new midterm questions.
A new Reuters report says White House officials have delayed the release of an ODNI voting machine study ahead of the 2026 midterms. The report reportedly identifies vulnerabilities in voting systems but does not claim votes were flipped. So why delay it? This episode breaks down the political psychology, the transparency problem, and the question both sides should be asking: if the report is done, why isn’t the public seeing it? Reuters reported the ODNI study flagged vulnerabilities such as outdated software and internet connectivity concerns, while also saying the report does not conclude those flaws changed votes.
A new Reuters report says White House officials have delayed the release of an ODNI voting machine study ahead of the 2026 midterms. The report reportedly identifies vulnerabilities in voting systems but does not claim votes were flipped. So why delay it? This episode breaks down the political psychology, the transparency problem, and the question both sides should be asking: if the report is done, why isn’t the public seeing it? Reuters reported the ODNI study flagged vulnerabilities such as outdated software and internet connectivity concerns, while also saying the report does not conclude those flaws changed votes.
Off Grid With Doug & Stacy
The Truth Always Comes Out.. But Nothing Happens!!
Synopsis: When they think we do not care anymore they let the TRUTH out...No one will get in trouble ...BUT THEY ALL LIED AND PEOPLE DIED!