Amir Tsarfati’s Behold Israel
More Dangerous Than You Think
—Replacement Theology—
—Replacement Theology—
Synopsis: Your stance on Israel isn’t just theological—it reveals what you believe about God’s promises. Rejecting Israel doesn’t just misinterpret Scripture, it calls into question the faithfulness of God Himself.
Amir Tsarfati is an Israeli Christian from Galilee. A former Deputy Governor of Jericho and IDF officer (hostage negotiator). He is a Bible teacher and a much sought after speaker world-wide. He is an Israeli tour guide, a well-known author, and the Founder and President of ‘Behold Israel,’ a Christian ministry with a world-wide outreach.
Amir Tsarfati is an Israeli Christian from Galilee. A former Deputy Governor of Jericho and IDF officer (hostage negotiator). He is a Bible teacher and a much sought after speaker world-wide. He is an Israeli tour guide, a well-known author, and the Founder and President of ‘Behold Israel,’ a Christian ministry with a world-wide outreach.
John Haller’s Prophecy Update
MOU Chaos
Harbinger’s Daily
By Robert Gottselig: I remember the day well, when a confused man approached my Friends of Israel Gospel Ministry literature table at a prophecy conference we were invited to, and point blank asked me, “How can you believe any of this?”
He then began pointing to all the different book tables set up by the different ministries and proceeded to tell me what he was struggling with. You see, even though he had not read the books represented, he assumed we all had major differences of opinion regarding the end times (eschatology). In his mind, how could anyone believe any of it?
The Problem of Misinterpretation
After several minutes of discussion, I realized that he had for years been studying different authors who were not dispensationalists. Instead, he had fallen for the teachings of those whose hermeneutic (method of interpreting the Bible) was not to interpret the Bible in a literal, grammatical, historical way. But rather their approach was to look at the Bible in an allegorical and spiritual way. No wonder this man was so confused, as that method of interpretation leads to nothing more than confusion, especially in regard to eschatology.
Charles Ryrie in his book Basic Theology says it well: “If used consistently, allegorical hermeneutics would reduce the Bible to near-fiction, for the normal meaning of words would be irrelevant and would be replaced by whatever meaning the interpreter gives to the symbols. However, for the most part, allegorical hermeneutics is not practiced consistently or thoroughly. Evangelicals who use this system do so usually in the area of prophecy, while using normal or literal hermeneutics in other areas of biblical Interpretation.”
It is amazing that so many Christians who interpret God’s Word literally concerning Jesus’ First Coming now shift gears in the way they read their Bibles concerning events linked to His Second Coming. Such was the case with a former pastor who would expositionally preach a good sermon until he came to Bible prophecy. Because for him, modern-day Israel meant nothing. There was no Rapture, no literal Tribulation Period, Jesus was not coming back literally with two feet planted on the Mount of Olives, and thus no literal 1,000-year Kingdom. Where does it end? How do you decide what to take literally and what not to?
He then began pointing to all the different book tables set up by the different ministries and proceeded to tell me what he was struggling with. You see, even though he had not read the books represented, he assumed we all had major differences of opinion regarding the end times (eschatology). In his mind, how could anyone believe any of it?
After several minutes of discussion, I realized that he had for years been studying different authors who were not dispensationalists. Instead, he had fallen for the teachings of those whose hermeneutic (method of interpreting the Bible) was not to interpret the Bible in a literal, grammatical, historical way. But rather their approach was to look at the Bible in an allegorical and spiritual way. No wonder this man was so confused, as that method of interpretation leads to nothing more than confusion, especially in regard to eschatology.
Charles Ryrie in his book Basic Theology says it well: “If used consistently, allegorical hermeneutics would reduce the Bible to near-fiction, for the normal meaning of words would be irrelevant and would be replaced by whatever meaning the interpreter gives to the symbols. However, for the most part, allegorical hermeneutics is not practiced consistently or thoroughly. Evangelicals who use this system do so usually in the area of prophecy, while using normal or literal hermeneutics in other areas of biblical Interpretation.”
It is amazing that so many Christians who interpret God’s Word literally concerning Jesus’ First Coming now shift gears in the way they read their Bibles concerning events linked to His Second Coming. Such was the case with a former pastor who would expositionally preach a good sermon until he came to Bible prophecy. Because for him, modern-day Israel meant nothing. There was no Rapture, no literal Tribulation Period, Jesus was not coming back literally with two feet planted on the Mount of Olives, and thus no literal 1,000-year Kingdom. Where does it end? How do you decide what to take literally and what not to?
Prophecy News Watch
By PNW Staff: The election of Washington, D.C. Councilmember Janeese Lewis George as the Democratic nominee for mayor is likely to become another flashpoint in the ongoing debate over the direction of the American left.
George's victory is significant not simply because of who she is, but because of what she represents. A member of the Democratic Socialists of America, she comes from a movement that openly advocates policies far beyond what many Americans would consider mainstream liberalism. While some voters may see these ideas as compassionate and forward-thinking, others view them as a warning sign of where progressive politics ultimately leads.
For many conservatives, the race serves as a reminder that the ideological shift within the Democratic Party is not slowing down—it is accelerating.
The Democratic Party of the 1990s under Bill Clinton embraced tougher crime policies, welfare reform, and stronger immigration enforcement. Today's party often takes very different positions on those same issues. Whether one views that change as progress or decline largely depends on political perspective, but the shift itself is difficult to deny.
George's victory is significant not simply because of who she is, but because of what she represents. A member of the Democratic Socialists of America, she comes from a movement that openly advocates policies far beyond what many Americans would consider mainstream liberalism. While some voters may see these ideas as compassionate and forward-thinking, others view them as a warning sign of where progressive politics ultimately leads.
For many conservatives, the race serves as a reminder that the ideological shift within the Democratic Party is not slowing down—it is accelerating.
The Democratic Party of the 1990s under Bill Clinton embraced tougher crime policies, welfare reform, and stronger immigration enforcement. Today's party often takes very different positions on those same issues. Whether one views that change as progress or decline largely depends on political perspective, but the shift itself is difficult to deny.
Front Page Magazine
By Daniel Greenfield: Every recent foreign policy disaster in the middle east seems to start with Qatar “helping us”.
There was Qatar “helping us” negotiate with the Taliban, helping us negotiate with Hamas and then helping us negotiate with Iran and find lots of cash for it.
Some cynical conspiracy types might say that Qatar, the state sponsor of the Muslim Brotherhood, which harbored Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11, isn’t really helping us, but using its useful idiots to destroy us… but that can’t be true.
After all look here, Qatar is helping Iran get hold of $100 billion which it will surely use to provide humanitarian aid. Especially the radioactive aid. And the aid that plant bombs. And the aid that can be fired at high speed.
There was Qatar “helping us” negotiate with the Taliban, helping us negotiate with Hamas and then helping us negotiate with Iran and find lots of cash for it.
Some cynical conspiracy types might say that Qatar, the state sponsor of the Muslim Brotherhood, which harbored Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11, isn’t really helping us, but using its useful idiots to destroy us… but that can’t be true.
After all look here, Qatar is helping Iran get hold of $100 billion which it will surely use to provide humanitarian aid. Especially the radioactive aid. And the aid that plant bombs. And the aid that can be fired at high speed.
Geller Report
By Pamela Geller: It’s sickening that Linda Sarsour, who has insisted that “shariah law is reasonable and once you read into the details it makes a lot of sense,” and that “nothing is creepier than Zionism,” and who has called for jihad against both the U.S. government and against Donald Trump in particular, emerged as a major player within the Mamdani campaign and is now feeling emboldened.