Showing posts with label NewsBusters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NewsBusters. Show all posts

Saturday, February 15, 2014

NPR SPINS EUTHANASIA AS ‘MEDICAL CARE THAT MAY HASTEN DEATH’


‘Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias’


NPR Gushes Over Prospect Of Euthanasia In U.S.

Matthew Balan, News Busters — NPR's Richard Knox played up a Pennsylvania judge's dismissal of a homicide case involving admitted euthanasia as "a sign that attitudes about end-of-life decisions are changing, whatever most statutes say," in a Wednesday item for the public radio network's health news blog. Knox euphemistically described the contoversial practice, as he asserted that "the [judge's] decision is the latest in a series of recent developments signaling a reluctance of courts and state legislatures to criminalize medical care that may hasten death."

The correspondent also slanted towards pro-euthanasia groups by including two quotes from a representative of an "advocacy group," while providing none from pro-life opponents.

Knox led his article, "Judge Dismisses Assisted Suicide Case Against Pennsylvania Nurse," by outling how "a Pennsylvania county judge has thrown out an assisted suicide case against a 58-year-old nurse named Barbara Mancini, who was accused of homicide last year for allegedly handing her 93-year-old father a bottle of morphine." He continued with his slanted "medical care that may hasten death" description of euthanasia, and cited unnamed "legal experts [who] say Mancini's prosecution for allegedly assisting a suicide isn't unique, but such cases are increasingly rare."

The NPR science journalist then made his claim that the rarity of assisted suicide prosecutions is "a sign that attitudes about end-of-life decisions are changing, whatever most statutes say," and gave a short summary of the circumstances of the case, where included his quotations from the pro-euthanasia activist:
Pennsylvania filed charges against Mancini last summer based on circumstances surrounding her father's death in February 2013. Joseph Yourshaw, the father, was a home hospice patient in failing health. When a hospice nurse checked on him and found him unresponsive, the hospice called 911 and had an ambulance take him to the hospital against the wishes of his family. He was revived, then died four days later. Mancini was later charged with assisting his suicide by providing him with a lethal dose of morphine.

"This case demonstrates that the government has no business interfering in families' end-of-life decisions," Mickey MacIntyre of the advocacy group Compassion and Choices said in a statement. "This prosecution could have chilled end-of-life decisions and pain care for millions of future terminally ill patients who simply want to die at home, peacefully and with dignity."

In a scathing 47-page opinion, Judge Jacqueline Russell wrote that Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane didn't establish that Mancini had committed a crime — that she intended to help her ailing father commit suicide rather than simply to alleviate his pain.
Several paragraphs later, Knox noted that "according to a hospice nurse and a police officer who talked to Mancini on Feb. 7, 2013, she [Mancini] said she had given him an entire vial of morphine to end his life. He had previously told family members and hospice workers that he wished to die. Mancini doesn't deny giving him the morphine bottle, but she denied that she intended to help him commit suicide and said she wanted only to relieve his pain."

The correspondent spent much of the rest of his article excerpting Judge Russell's "scathing" decision. He did include a summary of the prosecutor's early-on take about the case: "Anthony Forray, a deputy attorney general who prosecuted the case, characterized the evidence against Mancini in a pretrial hearing as overwhelming." He contended that she pressured hospice personnel to prescribe the morphine and handed him a full bottle with a 40-day supply, knowing that it would kill him if he took it."

However, Knox concluded by spotlighting how "a spokesman for Attorney General Kane said Tuesday afternoon that his office had not reviewed Russell's opinion and wanted to review it before making a comment. Compassion and Choices, which has supported Mancini and publicized the case nationally, is urging Kane not to appeal its dismissal."

NPR has a history of inserting its liberal slant into its coverage of social issues. Back in November 2013, correspondent Michele Kelemen boosted the foreign agenda of left-wing homosexual activists on All Things Considered by hyping the collaboration between visiting members of the "Rakurs" LGBT group from Russian and their American supporters. Kelemen hyped the testimony of one Rakurs member who lamented how the Russian city of Arkhangelsk has supposedly turned from a place "open to different views and trends" to a "stronghold of traditional values and religious beliefs in the Russian north."

Four months earlier, NPR journalist Wade Goodwyn ballyhooed Wendy Davis' pro-abortion filibuster in the Texas State Senate as a "tiny ray of hope" for Democrats in the Lone Star State. Goodwyn asserted that Davis' delaying tactic against a pro-life bill was "as good a moment as Texas Democrats have had in 20 years." » Full Article

About the Author
Matthew Balan is a news analyst at Media Research Center. He graduated from the University of Delaware in 2003, and worked for the Heritage Foundation from 2003 until 2006, and for Human Life International in 2006.

» Matthew Balan | Twitter
» NewsBusters


» Stop Censoring The News!

Monday, July 1, 2013

RALPH REED SMACKS DOWN RACHEL MADDOW FOR CLAIMING SAME-SEX OPPONENTS ARE PRO-DISCRIMINATION



Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias

“It is fascinating how all these liberal media members
complaining about intolerance don't recognize their own.”


» MRC TV

Noel Sheppard, News Busters — Faith and Freedom Coalition Founder Ralph Reed and MSNBC's Rachel Maddow had a heated exchange on NBC's Meet the Press Sunday.

When Maddow claimed that same-sex marriage opponents are "arguing in favor of discrimination," Reed strongly objected and eventually asked if Barack Obama was "a bigot 14 months ago" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
RACHEL MADDOW: You know, Justice--

RALPH REED: But, David--

RACHEL MADDOW: --Kennedy addressed that issue specifically in his ruling.

DAVID GREGORY: He talked about children as well.

RACHEL MADDOW: He says that by denying marriage rights to same-sex couples who have kids, you're humiliating and demeaning those kids by denying their families equal protection under the law by the parents who are raising them and who love them and who make their family. So we can put it in the interests of children, but I think that cuts both ways. And I think the ruling cuts against that argument.

I mean, gay people exist. There's nothing we can do in public policy that makes more or us exist or less of us exist. And you guys have been arguing for a generation that public policy ought to essentially demean gay people as a way of expressing disapproval of the fact that we exist. But you don't make any less of us exist. You just are arguing in favor of discrimination. And more discrimination doesn't make straight people's--

RALPH REED: I can't--

RACHEL MADDOW: lives any better.

RALPH REED: David, I really can't let that go. I mean, this suggestion that because somebody wants to affirm the institution of marriage that they're ipso facto intolerant? By that argument, Barack Obama was intolerant 14 months ago. By that argument, 342 members of the House, 85 members of the Senate (including, by the way, Joe Biden, Harry Reid, Pat Leahy) who all voted for this law, and Bill Clinton who signed it into law, were intolerant and motivated by an animus and a hatred for gays.

RACHEL MADDOW: They've all changed their mind on it.

RALPH REED: Now wait a minute-- this is--

RACHEL MADDOW: All of them.

RALPH REED: But we're talking about when they-- Obama was 14 months ago. Was he a bigot 14 months ago?

RACHEL MADDOW: Nobody's calling anybody a bigot.
Nobody's calling anybody a bigot? Really?

Maddow must not have been listening to herself when she said, "You just are arguing in favor of discrimination. And more discrimination doesn't make straight people's lives any better."

People that argue for discrimination are of course bigots.

Maddow doesn't seem to get that; Reed did:
RALPH REED: Was Hillary Clinton a bigot when she suggested that--

DAVID GREGORY: But wait a minute, just because--

RACHEL MADDOW: You’re the only one--

RALPH REED: --but to suggest that you are--

MICHAEL ERIC DYSON: --ideological divide here.

RALPH REED: --motivated by hatred for somebody else because you believe that the foundation enculturating and socializing institution of western civilization is something to be protected--

MICHAEL ERIC DYSON: Can I tell you this-- I gotta tell you this-- the same argument was made--

RALPH REED: --is intolerance itself.
Yes, it is fascinating how all these liberal media members complaining about intolerance don't recognize their own. » Full Article

» NewsBusters
» Noel Sheppard | Twitter

About the Author
Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters as well as a small business owner residing in Northern California. He is also a contributing writer to Fox Forum and the Washington Examiner. Noel welcomes feedback at NewsBustersNoel@gmail.com. Other websites Noel contributes to include National Review Online's "Planet Gore" as well as the prestigious American Thinker. » Full Bio



» Stop Censoring The News!

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

MSNBC HOST MELISSA HARRIS-PERRY» ALL YOUR KIDS BELONG TO US



Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias


» MRC TV

Your Children Do Not Belong To You

Ken Shepherd, News Busters — On March 23, my colleague Mark Finkelstein noted how MSNBC's Melissa Harris-Perry considers the unborn child a "thing" which takes a "lot of money" to "turn into a human," costing thousands of dollars to care for each year of his/her life. Now it appears that Harris-Perry thinks that, after they're born, children fundamentally belong to the state.

Narrating a new MSNBC "Lean Forward" spot, the Tulane professor laments that we in America "haven't had a very collective notion that these are our children." "[W]e have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families, and recognize that kids belong to their communities," Harris-Perry argued.

"Once it's everybody's responsibility and not just the households, then we start making better investments." By "investments," of course, Harris-Perry means things like spending "as much in public education as we should have."

Of course, if as Harris-Perry holds,"[t]he cost to raise a child [is] $10,000 a year up to $20,000 a year," and if children should be viewed as collectively "owned" by "society," then taken to its logical extension, a woman's choices about having a child should be informed by the economic considerations of the "community," would it not? But of course, that logic would take someone to justify, for example, the "one-child" policy in Communist China.

What's more, the notion of collective responsibility for children was a philosophy that undergirded the Cultural Revolution in Communist China under Chairman Mao. I bring that up because, as you may recall, another Harris-Perry "Lean Forward" spot contains a reference to a "great leap forward," which calls to mind the disastrous agricultural reform plan which starved millions of Chinese to death in the 1950s. » Full Article

Related: » MSNBC’s ‘Lean Forward’ Ad Unwittingly Alludes to Communist 'Great Leap Forward,' Which Killed Millions of Chinese

» NewsBusters
» Ken Shepherd Article Archive

About the Author
Ken Shepherd is Managing Editor of NewsBusters. Click here to follow Ken Shepherd on Twitter.
» Full Bio



» Stop Censoring The News!

Saturday, March 23, 2013

CNN PANEL COMPARES TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE SUPPORTERS TO SEGREGATIONISTS, SLAVE OWNERS



NewsBusters
Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias


Video Description: Watch to see how the lone supporter of traditional marriage on CNN's Friday afternoon panel was treated.

Anchor Don Lemon led the disgusting display of liberal non-tolerance, comparing supporters of traditional marriage to segregationists.

» MRC TV

About MRC TV
MRC TV is an online platform for people to share and view videos, photos, articles and opinions on topics that are important to them -- from news to political issues and rip-roaring humor. People use the site to upload, view and share content, connect with friends, classmates and colleagues, and make new acquaintances.





Demand The Liberal Media Stop Censoring The News!


Radio host Mark Levin encourages listeners to demand that the media "stop censoring the news."

» Stop Censoring The News!