Showing posts with label Assault on Freedom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Assault on Freedom. Show all posts

Saturday, July 4, 2015

CHRISTIAN BAKERS AARON AND MELISSA KLEIN FINED $135,000 THEN SILENCED FROM DISCUSSING IT


The Magazine Of Record For The Last Days
Are You Ready For What Comes Next?

HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY, AMERICA!
LAND OF THE FREE AND... HOME OF THE PERSECUTED
WELCOME TO OBAMA’S AMERICA

“This effectively strips us of all our First Amendment rights,” the Kleins, owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa,
which has since closed, wrote on their Facebook page. “According to the state of Oregon
we neither have freedom of religion or freedom of speech.”

STATE SILENCES BAKERS WHO REFUSED
TO MAKE CAKE FOR LESBIAN COUPLE,
FINES THEM $135K

EDITOR’S NOTE: Close your eyes for a moment, and imagine a world in which Christians are ordered by a judge to produce a product that is in direct opposition to their faith in God. Then, when they refuse to violate their faith, they are fined $135,000 and driven into bankruptcy. Lastly, when they are interviewed about it the judge then slaps a “cease and desist” order on them so they cannot talk about why they could not bake the lesbian wedding cake. Now, open our eyes…welcome to Obama’s America.

Geoffrey Grider, Editor-in-chief and founder of Now The End Begins —
Oregon Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian finalized a preliminary ruling today ordering Aaron and Melissa Klein, the bakers who refused to make a cake for a same-sex wedding, to pay $135,000 in emotional damages to the couple they denied service.

Oregon Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian finalized a preliminary ruling today ordering Aaron and Melissa Klein, the bakers who refused to make a cake for a same-sex wedding, to pay $135,000 in emotional damages to the couple they denied service.

“This case is not about a wedding cake or a marriage,” Avakian wrote. “It is about a business’s refusal to serve someone because of their sexual orientation. Under Oregon law, that is illegal.”

In the ruling, Avakian placed an effective gag order on the Kleins, ordering them to “cease and desist” from speaking publicly about not wanting to bake cakes for same-sex weddings based on their Christian beliefs.

The cease and desist came about after Aaron and Melissa Klein participated in an interview with Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins. During the interview, Aaron said among other things, “This fight is not over. We will continue to stand strong.”

Lawyers for plaintiffs, Rachel and Laurel Bowman-Cryer, argued that in making this statement, the Kleins violated an Oregon law banning people from acting on behalf of a place of public accommodation (in this case, the place would be the Klein’s’ former bakery) to communicate anything to the effect that the place of public accommodation would discriminate.

Administrative Law Judge Alan McCullough, who is employed by the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries and was appointed by Avakian, threw out the argument in the “proposed order” he issued back in April.

BUT TODAY, AVAKIAN, WHO WAS IN CHARGE OF MAKING THE FINAL RULING IN THE CASE—AND IS ALSO AN ELECTED POLITICIAN—REVERSED THAT DECISION

“The Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor and Industries hereby orders [Aaron and Melissa Klein] to cease and desist from publishing, circulating, issuing or displaying, or causing to be published … any communication to the effect that any of the accommodations … will be refused, withheld from or denied to, or that any discrimination be made against, any person on account of their sexual orientation,” Avakian wrote.

Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, called the order “outrageous” and said citizens of Oregon should be “ashamed.”

“This order is an outrageous abuse of the rights of the Kleins to freely practice their religion under the First Amendment,” he said.


It is exactly this kind of oppressive persecution
by government officials
that led the pilgrims to America.


It is exactly this kind of oppressive persecution by government officials that led the pilgrims to America. And Commissioner Avakian’s order that the Kleins stop speaking about this case is even more outrageous—and also a fundamental violation of their right to free speech under the First Amendment.

Avakian would have fit right in as a bureaucrat in the Soviet Union or Red China. Oregon should be ashamed that such an unprincipled, scurrilous individual is a government official in the state.

The case began in February 2013 when Rachel and Laurel Bowman-Cryer filed a complaint against the Kleins for refusing to bake them a wedding cake. At the time of the refusal, same-sex marriage had not yet been legalized in Oregon.

The Bowman-Cryers’ complaint went to the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, which is in charge of defending the law that prohibits businesses from refusing service to customers based on their sexual orientation, among other characteristics, called the Equality Act of 2007.

In January 2014, the agency found the Kleins unlawfully discriminated against the couple because of their sexual orientation. In April, McCullough recommended they pay $75,000 to Rachel and $60,000 to Laurel.

In order to reach the total amount, $135,000, Rachel and Laurel submitted a long list of alleged physical, emotional and mental damages they claim to have experienced as a result of the Kleins’ unlawful conduct.

Examples of symptoms included “acute loss of confidence,” “doubt,” “excessive sleep,” “felt mentally raped, dirty and shameful,” “high blood pressure,” “impaired digestion,” “loss of appetite,” “migraine headaches,” “pale and sick at home after work,” “resumption of smoking habit,” “shock” “stunned,” “surprise,” “uncertainty,” “weight gain” and “worry.”

In their Facebook post, the Kleins signaled their intention to appeal Avakian’s ruling, writing, “We will not give up this fight and we will not be silenced,” already perhaps putting themselves at risk of violating the cease and desist. source
About ‘Now The End Begins’
GEOFFREY GRIDER, Editor-in-chief and founder of Now The End Begins. Geoffrey started NOW THE END BEGINS on December 15, 2009, as a global aggregate news site showing the seriousness of the times in which we live. Since then, the site has grown to include cutting-edge original reporting on topics that mean the most to our readers.

Connect with NTEB
Bookmark These Links!
» Now The End Begins | News Desk
» Now The End Begins | Website
» Now The End Begins | Vimeo

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

A GOVERNMENT EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD FEAR


America’s Independent News Network
“A Free Press for a Free People”


New Mexico Court of Appeal Judge:
“States Can Demand Christians Violate Their Faith”

WND EXCLUSIVE — The U.S. Supreme Court delivered evidence to the American people Monday that they should fear their own government.

That’s according to the Alliance Defending Freedom, which fought all the way to the highest court to protect a New Mexico photographer’s freedoms of speech, conscience and religion.

Ultimately, however, the life-tenured justices refused to hear the case, allowing to stand a decision that effectively allows government to force individuals to promote messages they oppose, ADF said.

“Only unjust laws separate what people say from what they believe,” said ADF Senior Counsel Jordan Lorence. “The First Amendment protects our freedom to speak or not speak on any issue without fear of punishment.”

The dispute arose after photographer Elaine Huguenin declined a job to commemorate the same-sex union of two lesbians.

The women filed a complaint with the New Mexico Human Rights Commission, which charged Huguenin and her business partner, husband Jon, with violating the state’s “sexual orientation” law. The commission ordered the Huguenins to pay more than $6,000 in attorney fees to the couple, even though the two women found someone else to photograph their ceremony. A New Mexico trial court, the New Mexico Court of Appeals and the state Supreme Court upheld the ruling.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme court allowed the decision to stand.

Lorence said ADF had hoped the Supreme Court “would use this case to affirm this basic constitutional principle; however, the court will likely have several more opportunities to do just that in other cases of ours that are working their way through the court system.”

ADF Senior Counsel David Cortman said Americans “oppose unjust laws that strong-arm citizens to express ideas against their will.”

“Elaine and numerous others like her around the country have been more than willing to serve any and all customers, but they are not willing to promote any and all messages,” he said. “A government that forces any American to create a message contrary to her own convictions is a government every American should fear.”

ADF said that while the punishment handed out in the New Mexico case is now permanent, there are other cases that likely will push the justices into making determinations on what the government can force Christians to say or do.

According to ADF, other cases in the legal pipeline that could reach the U.S. Supreme Court include:
Ingersoll v. Arlene’s Flowers: A long-time customer and friend of florist Baronelle Stutzman sued her because she could not in good conscience use her creative skills to beautify his same-sex ceremony. Both he, through his ACLU attorneys, and the Washington state attorney general have filed lawsuits against Stutzman in both her professional and personal capacities for unlawful “discrimination,” even though she has served and employed people who identify as homosexual and numerous other florists are willing to do the work.

Craig v. Masterpiece Cakeshop: Two men filed a legal complaint against Colorado cake artist Jack Phillips after he declined to use his artistic talents to create and decorate a cake for a same-sex ceremony. Although many other cake artists are willing to do the work, and Phillips told the men that he would be willing to make them any other type of baked good, the men nonetheless filed discrimination complaints against him through their ACLU attorneys.

Baker v. Hands On Originals: The Gay and Lesbian Services Organization filed a legal complaint against a Kentucky T-shirt printer for declining to produce shirts that promote its “pride festival.” Managing owner Blaine Adamson of Hands On Originals told GLSO he would gladly refer them to another shop that would do the work for the same price. GLSO easily found someone to produce the shirts for free. In addition, Hands On Originals both serves and employs people who identify as homosexual. Nonetheless, the complaint alleges that the printer is guilty of “discrimination.”
The New Mexico case began in 2006 when Elaine Huguenin received an email from a woman, Vanessa Willock, asking if she would be “open to helping us celebrate our day,” a “commitment ceremony” between her and her same-sex partner.

When Huguenin politely declined because the ceremony was at odds with her beliefs, ADF said, Willock found another photographer, for less money.

Nevertheless, Willock pursued a complaint with the New Mexico Human Rights Commission, demanding Huguenin be punished.

The commission ruled against Huguenin, ordering her to pay $6,637.94 in attorneys’ fees to Willock. The case then made its way through the New Mexico state court system, and the New Mexico Supreme Court upheld the ruling.

One of the state Supreme Court justices said that being ordered to compromise one’s beliefs is simply the “price of citizenship.”

WND reported when the state court, including judges Edward Chavez, Petra Jimenez Maes, Charles Daniels, Barbara Vigil and Richard Bosson, ruled against the photographer, because she has the option of going out of business.

The judges stated:
At its heart, this case teaches that at some point in our lives all of us must compromise, if only a little, to accommodate the contrasting values of others. A multicultural, pluralistic society, one of our nation’s strengths, demands no less. The Huguenins are free to think, to say, to believe, as they wish; they may pray to the God of their choice and follow those commandments in their personal lives wherever they lead. The Constitution protects the Huguenins in that respect and much more. But there is a price, one that we all have to pay somewhere in our civic life.

In the smaller, more focused world of the marketplace, of commerce, of public accommodation, the Huguenins have to channel their conduct, not their beliefs, so as to leave space for other Americans who believe something different. That compromise is part of the glue that holds us together as a nation, the tolerance that lubricates the varied moving parts of us as a people. That sense of respect we owe others, whether or not we believe as they do, illuminates this country, setting it apart from the discord that afflicts much of the rest of the world. In short, I would say to the Huguenins, with the utmost respect: it is the price of citizenship.
As WND reported, Judge Tim L. Garcia of the New Mexico Court of Appeals earlier said states can demand Christians violate their faith. » Full Article

Related Article:
» Supremes ‘Serious’ About ‘Gay’ Suits vs. Christians
“This is not what our 1st Amendment allows people to do”

» WND

Other Headline News On WND

» Mexican Soldiers Draw Guns On U.S. Agents
2 foreign combatants stick up Americans in Arizona standoff
The U.S. government is taking no action on an “unbelievable foray” in which two Mexican soldiers came across the border near Sasabe, Ariz., and held U.S. Border Patrol agents at gunpoint for half an hour, according to a government watchdog organization.

» Microsoft Founder Invests $40M In Foreign Vote-Count Firm
Comes as city holds world's 1st Internet-only election
Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, a supporter of President Obama, is investing $40 million in Scytl, the Spain-based firm that in January 2012 acquired 100 percent of SOE Software, the leading software provider of election management solutions in the United States.

» ‘NOAH’ Revives Ancient Enemy Of Christianity
Larry Stone marks latest attempt to resurrect nemesis of faith
Darren Aronofsky and Ari Handel did not write the movie “Noah” using the Bible as their text, say Joel McDurmon and Brian Mattson. Instead, the movie is written based on an ancient understanding of the world found in the Jewish mystical tradition of the Kabbalah.

NEWSBUSTED: APRIL 8, 2014


The Green Light For Conservative Laughter!
Starring Jodi Miller


Topics for this Edition of NewsBusted
Obamacare
Unemployment
Healthcare.gov
Ft. Hood Shooting
David Letterman Retires
Stephen Colbert
Ted Cruz
Major League Baseball

» NewsBusted | MRCTV
» MRCTV

About NewsBusted
The Media Research Center’s NewsBusted comedy show, with jokes about politics, Hollywood and liberal media bias.


» Stop Censoring The News!

Monday, February 3, 2014

AMERICANS ARE LOSING THEIR FREEDOM?




Americans Fought A War To End Slavery.
Will We Have To Fight To Resist Becoming Slaves?

Alan Caruba, Guest Contributor — February 1st was National Freedom Day. It commemorates Lincoln’s signing of the House and Senate resolution that later became the 13th Amendment. Lincoln signed the Amendment outlawing slavery on February 1, 1865.

Short of another Civil War, Americans have reached a point verging on the loss of their Constitutional freedoms as ever before. The issue then was slavery, but Americans are rapidly moving toward having their Bill of Rights annulled by a President intent on ruling as a despot, making them slaves of a regime that rules as he wishes, ignoring the Constitution and Congress.

His actions have been supported by the Democratic members of Congress and because Republicans only control the House they have seen their legislative efforts to oppose the regime blocked, often by one man, Harry Reid, the Senate Majority Leader. The nation’s media with few exceptions have supported or ignored the President’s actions.

Why is this happening? A brief review of the means put forth in Saul Alinski’s “Rules for Radicals”, written by a “community organizer”, outlines what Obama is doing as he seeks to turn America into a socialist state. It is a process that progressives/liberals have been pursuing since early in the last century.

1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people.

2) Poverty – Increase the poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4) Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).

6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.

7) Religion – Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools.

8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

We are close to having everything we write and say known to the regime. As Andrew Napolitano asks, “What if the government spies on all of us all the time and recognizes no limits to its spying? What if its appetite for acquiring personal knowledge about all Americans is insatiable? What if the government uses the microchips in our cellphones to follow us and listen to us as we move about?”

And what if Congress, as World Net Daily’s Bob Unruh has written, has empowered the President to “arrest, kidnap, detain without trial and hold indefinitely American citizens thought to ‘represent an enduring security threat to the United States.’” That’s what the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) does!

“Some of the nation’s most respected legal teams are asking the Supreme Court to take up a challenge to the indefinite-detention provisions” of the Act “charging that the law has created the framework for a police state.” That’s how far along we are toward the destruction of the U.S. Constitution.

“The 2014 NDAA was fast-tracked through the U.S. Senate, with no time for discussion or amendments, while most Americans were distracted by the scandal surrounding A&E’s troubles with ‘Duck Dynasty’ star Phil Robertson. Eighty-five of 100 senators voted in favor of the new version of the NDAA, which had already been quietly passed by the House of Representatives.”

Ostensibly a law to address terrorists, the NDAA is a blueprint for a nation in which its citizens have none of the rights spelled out in the Bill of Rights. All it will take is the declaration of martial law or a national emergency.

Sen. Ted Cruz, a leading opponent of Obamacare, writing in The Wall Street Journal, said, “Of all the troubling aspects of the Obama presidency, none is more dangerous than the President’s persistent pattern of lawlessness, his willingness to disregard the written law and instead enforce his own policies via executive fiat…the President’s taste for unilateral action to circumvent Congress should concern every citizen, regardless of party or ideology.”

Americans will soon have little recourse against a government intent on controlling every aspect of their lives, spying on them, and arresting them for criticizing it.

A May 16 march on Washington may cause the White House and the Congress to pause in its attacks on our freedom and liberty. One can only hope that millions participate.

Americans fought a war to end slavery. Will we have to fight to resist becoming slaves?

» Full Article

About The Post Author, Alan Caruba
Alan Caruba is a long time a writer by profession. He has several books to his credit and his daily column, "Warning Signs", is disseminated on many Internet news and opinion websites, as well as blogs. In addition, he is a longtime book reviewer and has a blog offering a monthly report on new fiction and non-fiction.

» Alan Caruba | Article Archive
» TPNN | Site
» The Tea Party

Other Headline News On TPNN

» Ted Cruz: Obama’s Disregard For The Constitution ‘Threatens The Liberty Of Every American’
Just prior to Obama’s State of the Union address on Tuesday, Senator Ted Cruz was asked by CNS News whether Obama has the constitutional authority to act on “climate change” without congressional approval. Cruz responds: “Over and over again this president has disregarded the law, has disregarded the Constitution and has asserted presidential power that simply doesn’t exist...”

» Congressman Calls Obama ‘Socialistic Dictator’
Texas Congressman Randy Weber, in anticipation of the Obama State of the Union address in which he announced more dictatorial and unconstitutional executive orders, tweeted the following from the House floor on Tuesday evening: “On floor of house waitin on “Kommandant-In-Chief”… the Socialistic dictator who’s been feeding US a line or is it “A-Lying?”

» Sick Children Denied Coverage In Seattle Due To Obamacare
When Obamacare was being sold to the American people, it was done with many lofty promises, most of which we have learned were all lies. In addition to a promise of lower costs that turned out to not be true, Obama said over and over again that those with pre-existing conditions would not be denied coverage. This was one of the biggest statements used to demonize insurance companies.


TPNN VIDEO CHANNEL
Matthew Burke to Congress:
Do Your Job, Impeach Dictator Obama

“Matthew Burke from TPNN.com delivers the Tea Party Weekly Address in powerful form. In response to Obama’s State of the Union address during which he essentially pledged to rule America by edict, Burke calls for Congress to once and for all do their job and begin impeachment proceedings against Barack Obama.” » TPNN | YouTube

Saturday, January 4, 2014

LIFE IN THE EMERGING AMERICAN POLICE STATE: WHAT’S IN STORE FOR OUR FREEDOMS IN 2014?



Dedicated To The Defense Of
Civil Liberties And Human Rights


“Those Who Cannot Remember The Past
Are Condemned To Repeat It”
—George Santayana, The Life of Reason, Vol. 1

John Whitehead, The Rutherford Institute — In Harold Ramis’ classic 1993 comedy Groundhog Day, TV weatherman Phil Connors (played by Bill Murray) is forced to live the same day over and over again until he not only gains some insight into his life but changes his priorities. Similarly, as I illustrate in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, we in the emerging American police state find ourselves reliving the same set of circumstances over and over again—egregious surveillance, strip searches, police shootings of unarmed citizens, government spying, the criminalization of lawful activities, warmongering, etc.—although with far fewer moments of comic hilarity.

What remains to be seen is whether 2014 will bring more of the same or whether “we the people” will wake up from our somnambulant states. Indeed, when it comes to civil liberties and freedom, 2013 was far from a banner year. The following is just a sampling of what we can look forward to repeating if we don’t find some way to push back against the menace of an overreaching, aggressive, invasive, militarized government and restore our freedoms.

Government Spying
It’s hard to understand how anyone could be surprised by the news that the National Security Agency has been systematically collecting information on all telephone calls placed in the United States, and yet the news media have treated it as a complete revelation. Nevertheless, such outlandish government spying been going on domestically since the 1970s, when Senator Frank Church (D-Ida.), who served as the chairman of the Select Committee on Intelligence that investigated the NSA’s breaches, warned the public against allowing the government to overstep its authority in the name of national security. Church recognized that such surveillance powers “at any time could be turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn’t matter. There would be no place to hide.” Recent reports indicate that the NSA, in conjunction with the CIA and FBI, has actually gone so far as to intercept laptop computers ordered online in order to install spyware on them.

Militarized Police
With almost 13,000 agencies in all 50 states and four U.S. territories participating in a military “recycling” program, community police forces across the country continue to be transformed into outposts of the military, with police agencies acquiring military-grade hardware—tanks, weaponry, and other equipment designed for the battlefield—in droves. Keep in mind that once acquired, this military equipment, which is beyond the budget and scope of most communities, finds itself put to all manner of uses by local law enforcement agencies under the rationale that “if we have it, we might as well use it”—the same rationale, by the way, used with deadly results to justify assigning SWAT teams to carry out routine law enforcement work such as delivering a warrant.



Police Shootings Of Unarmed Citizens
Owing in large part to the militarization of local law enforcement agencies, not a week goes by without more reports of hair-raising incidents by police imbued with a take-no-prisoners attitude and a battlefield approach to the communities in which they serve. Sadly, it is no longer unusual to hear about incidents in which police shoot unarmed individuals first and ask questions later, such as the 16-year-old teenager who skipped school only to be shot by police after they mistook him for a fleeing burglar. Then there was the unarmed black man in Texas “who was pursued and shot in the back of the neck by Austin Police… after failing to properly identify himself and leaving the scene of an unrelated incident.” And who could forget the 19-year-old Seattle woman who was accidentally shot in the leg by police after she refused to show her hands? The lesson to be learned: this is what happens when you take a young man (or woman), raise him on a diet of violence, hype him up on the power of the gun in his holster and the superiority of his uniform, render him woefully ignorant of how to handle a situation without resorting to violence, train him well in military tactics but allow him to be illiterate about the Constitution, and never stress to him that he is to be a peacemaker and a peacekeeper, respectful of and subservient to the taxpayers, who are in fact his masters and employers.

The Erosion Of Private Property
If the government can tell you what you can and cannot do within the privacy of your home, whether it relates to what you eat or what you smoke, you no longer have any rights whatsoever within your home. If government officials can fine and arrest you for growing vegetables in your front yard, praying with friends in your living room, installing solar panels on your roof, and raising chickens in your backyard, you’re no longer the owner of your property. If school officials can punish your children for what they do or say while at home or in your care, your children are not your own—they are the property of the state. If government agents can invade your home, break down your doors, kill your dog, damage your furnishings and terrorize your family, your property is no longer private and secure—it belongs to the government. Likewise, if police can forcefully draw your blood, strip search you, and probe you intimately, your body is no longer your own, either. This is what a world without the Fourth Amendment looks like, where the lines between private and public property have been so blurred that private property is reduced to little more than something the government can use to control, manipulate and harass you to suit its own purposes, and you the homeowner and citizen have been reduced to little more than a tenant or serf in bondage to an inflexible landlord.

Strip Searches And
The Loss Of Bodily Integrity
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was intended to protect the citizenry from being subjected to “unreasonable searches and seizures” by government agents. While the literal purpose of the amendment is to protect our property and our bodies from unwarranted government intrusion, the moral intention behind it is to protect our human dignity. Unfortunately, court rulings undermining the Fourth Amendment and justifying invasive strip searches have left us powerless against police empowered to forcefully draw our blood, strip search us, and probe us intimately. For example, during a routine traffic stop, Leila Tarantino was allegedly subjected to two roadside strip searches in plain view of passing traffic, while her two children—ages 1 and 4—waited inside her car. During the second strip search, presumably in an effort to ferret out drugs, a female officer “forcibly removed” a tampon from Tarantino. No contraband or anything illegal was found.

Invasion Of The Drones
As corporations and government agencies alike prepare for their part in the coming drone invasion—it is expected that at least 30,000 drones will occupy U.S. airspace by 2020, ushering in a $30 billion per year industry—it won’t be long before Americans discover first-hand that drones—unmanned aerial vehicles—come in all shapes and sizes, from nano-sized drones as small as a grain of sand that can do everything from conducting surveillance to detonating explosive charges, to middle-sized copter drones that can deliver pizzas to massive “hunter/killer” Predator warships that unleash firepower from on high. Police in California have already begun using Qube drones, which are capable of hovering for 40 minutes at heights of about 400 ft. to conduct surveillance on targets as far as 1 kilometer away. Michael Downing, the LAPD deputy chief for counter-terrorism and special operations, envisions drones being flown over large-scale media events such as the Oscars, using them to surveil political protests, and flying them through buildings to track criminal suspects.

Criminalizing Childish Behavior
It wouldn’t be a week in America without another slew of children being punished for childish behavior under the regime of zero tolerance which plagues our nation’s schools. Some of the most egregious: the 9-year-old boy suspended for allegedly pointing a toy at a classmate and saying “bang, bang”; two 6-year-old students in Maryland suspended for using their fingers as imaginary guns in a schoolyard game of cops and robbers; the ten-year-old Pennsylvania boy suspended for shooting an imaginary “arrow” at a fellow classmate, using nothing more than his hands and his imagination; the six-year-old Colorado boy suspended and accused of sexual harassment for kissing the hand of a girl in his class whom he had a crush on; and the two seventh graders in Virginia suspended for the rest of the school year for playing with airsoft guns in their own yard before school.

Common Core
There are several methods for controlling a population. You can intimidate the citizenry into obedience through force, relying on military strength and weaponry such as SWAT team raids, militarized police, and a vast array of lethal and nonlethal weapons. You can manipulate them into marching in lockstep with your dictates through the use of propaganda and carefully timed fear tactics about threats to their safety, whether through the phantom menace of terrorist attacks or shooting sprees by solitary gunmen. Or you can indoctrinate them into compliance from an early age through the schools, discouraging them from thinking for themselves while rewarding them for regurgitating whatever the government, through its so-called educational standards, dictates they should be taught. When viewed in light of the government’s ongoing attempts to amass power at great cost to Americans—in terms of free speech rights, privacy, due process, etc.—the debate over Common Core State Standards, which would transform and nationalize school curriculum from kindergarten through 12th grade, becomes that much more critical. These standards, which were developed through a partnership between big government and corporations and are being rolled out in 45 states and the District of Columbia, will create a generation of test-takers capable of little else, molded and shaped by the federal government and its corporate allies into what it considers to be ideal citizens.

The Corporate Takeover Of America
The corporate buyout of the American political bureaucracy is taking place at every level of government, from the White House all the way to the various governors’ mansions, and even local city councils. With Big Business and Big Government having fused into a corporate state, the president and his state counterparts—the governors, have become little more than CEOs of the Corporate State, which day by day is assuming more government control over our lives. The average American has no access to his or her representatives at any but the lowest level of government, and even then it’s questionable how much really gets through. Never before have average Americans had so little say in the workings of their government and even less access to their so-called representatives. Yet one of the key ingredients in maintaining democratic government is the right of citizens to freely speak their minds to those who represent them. In fact, it is one of the few effective tools we have left to combat government corruption and demand accountability. But now, even that right is being chipped away by laws and court rulings that weaken our ability to speak freely to the politicians who govern us.

James Madison, the father of the Constitution, put it best: “Take alarm,” he warned, “at the first experiment with liberties.” Anyone with even a casual knowledge about current events knows that the first experiment on our freedoms happened long ago. Worse, we have not heeded the warnings of Madison and those like him who understood that if you give the government an inch, they will take a mile. Unfortunately, the government has not only taken a mile, they have taken mile after mile after mile after mile with seemingly no end in sight for their power grabs.

If you’re in the business of making New Year’s resolutions, why not resolve that 2014 will be the year we break the cycle of tyranny and get back on the road to freedom. As I’ve said before, it’s time for a second American revolution. » Full Article

About the Author
John W. Whitehead is an attorney and author who has written, debated and practiced widely in the area of constitutional law and human rights. Whitehead's concern for the persecuted and oppressed led him, in 1982, to establish The Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties and human rights organization whose international headquarters are located in Charlottesville, Virginia. Whitehead serves as the Institute’s president and spokesperson, in addition to writing a weekly commentary that is posted on The Rutherford Institute’s website, as well being distributed to several hundred newspapers, and hosting a national public service radio campaign. Whitehead's aggressive, pioneering approach to civil liberties issues has earned him numerous accolades, including the Hungarian Medal of Freedom. » Full Bio

» John Whitehead | Commentaries

About The Rutherford Institute
The Rutherford Institute, a nonprofit civil liberties organization based in Charlottesville, Va., is deeply committed to protecting the constitutional freedoms of every American and the integral human rights of all people through its extensive legal and educational programs. The Institute provides its legal services at no charge to those whose constitutional and human rights have been threatened or violated. » Read More

» The Rutherford Institute

More Commentaries On
The Rutherford Institute

» Licensed to Kill: The Growing Phenomenon of Police Shooting Unarmed Citizens
Here’s a recipe for disaster: Take a young man (or woman), raise him on a diet of violence, hype him up on the power of the gun in his holster and the superiority of his uniform, render him woefully ignorant of how to handle a situation without resorting to violence, train him well in military tactics but allow him to be illiterate about the Constitution, and never stress to him that he is to be a peacemaker and a peacekeeper, respectful of and subservient to the taxpayers, who are in fact his masters and employers.

» America’s New Normal: Mass Surveillance, Secret Courts and Death to Whistleblowers
There is a deep and abiding sense of unease permeating American society. From the IRS targeting politically conservative groups to the Department of Justice targeting journalists for surveillance, from the revelation that the National Security Agency (NSA) is tracking the telephone calls of most Americans to the public spectacle of whistleblower Bradley Manning’s trial, in recent weeks there has been no shortage of evidence that the new “normal” in the United States is not friendly to freedom.

» Common Core: A Lesson Plan for Raising Up Compliant, Non-Thinking Citizens
As I point out in my new book, 'A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State', there are several methods for controlling a population. You can intimidate the citizenry into obedience through force, relying on military strength and weaponry such as SWAT team raids, militarized police, and a vast array of lethal and nonlethal weapons. You can manipulate them into marching in lockstep with your dictates through the use of propaganda and carefully timed fear tactics about threats to their safety, whether through the phantom menace of terrorist attacks or shooting sprees by solitary gunmen. Or you can indoctrinate them into compliance from an early age through the schools, discouraging them from thinking for themselves while rewarding them for regurgitating whatever the government, through its so-called educational standards, dictates they should be taught.

Monday, June 17, 2013

WILL CONGRESS SAVE TROOPS’ CHRISTIANITY?





The Obama administration released a statement in recent days urging rejection of the amendment to protect the sharing of faith, claiming it would have “a significant adverse effect on good order, discipline, morale and mission accomplishment.



WND TV, Radio America — Religious freedom in the military is a hot topic following a controversial meeting between Pentagon officials and an anti-Christian activist seeking to remove God from the military, and now Congress is on the verge of preserving those freedoms through the annual National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA.

The furor over the rights of service members to share their faith peaked in April and May after Mikey Weinstein of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation held a meeting with Pentagon leaders and reportedly received assurances that members of the military found sharing their faith would be prosecuted.

The Pentagon tried to tamp down criticism of those stories by saying expressing one’s faith is fine but proselytizing is not.

Now, Rep. John Fleming, R-La., a member of the House Armed Services Committee, is advancing an amendment to the NDAA that would guarantee service members not only the right to believe as they wish but to express those beliefs freely as well.

“It allows for military members to exercise their First Amendment right within appropriate limits, so that not only can they maintain their beliefs of conscience … but also they can express it and they can take action, which means they can have a Bible on their desk or they can speak in a noncoercive fashion with other members,” said Fleming, who added that the amendment would not allow service members to disobey orders.

“If your commanding officer says, ‘Get in that tank and go shoot,’ you can’t say all of a sudden that, ‘It’s against my religion.’ You can’t do that,” he said.

In addition to the Pentagon meeting with Weinstein, several stories of religious freedoms being infringed concern Fleming. He said service personnel have been reprimanded for having a Bible on their desk, been denied promotion because of their beliefs, expressing their beliefs in blogs and other forums or even serving Chick-fil-A at a promotion event. Fleming said that’s just the tip of the iceberg.



“It was pretty clear that there was a common thread of suppression for free speech, particularly for those who express religious beliefs and even particularly more for those who express Christian beliefs,” he said. “In some of their training at the Pentagon, they claim that evangelical Christianity is an extremism and consistent with the KKK and al-Qaida.”

The restrictions on military chaplains are also alarming to Fleming.

“Chaplains have to have their speeches reviewed and accepted and certainly have words like ‘Jesus’ removed from a Christian chaplain’s prayer or a situation where they’re not even allowed to hand a Bible to someone or share their faith with someone. That’s really what we’ve become,” he said.

However, Fleming is encouraged that his amendment has sailed through the House Armed Services Committee and was part of the NDAA that passed the full House Friday. He said there was strong bipartisan support for it. In addition, Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, is advancing the amendment in the Senate. It has passed the democratically controlled Senate Armed Services Committee and now awaits consideration from the full Senate.

But not everyone is on board. The Obama administration released a statement in recent days urging rejection of the amendment to protect the sharing of faith, claiming it would have “a significant adverse effect on good order, discipline, morale and mission accomplishment.”

However, Fleming said that’s simply untrue, and he is not fazed by the White House opposition. He believes if the Senate approves the NDAA with the religious freedom language, Obama won’t be in the mood to pick a fight with so many members of his own party and will sign it into law.
» Full Article

» WND


Other Breaking News Items On WND

» FBI Director Should Hand In His Badge Now!
Exclusive: Joseph Farah demands resignation of official who ignores national security threat

» Defector: Iran Prez Picked By Ayatollah, Not Vote
Did Obama's election fraud start a new trend? Ex-Revolutionary Guard intelligence analyst says West has been duped.

» Syrian Forces Training To Sstorm Israel's Border
Comes amid stepped up U.S. support for 'rebels'

Saturday, June 15, 2013

U.S. SENATOR TED CRUZ: OBAMA ASSAULTING FREEDOM ON EVERY FRONT





William Green and Sarah Harvard, The Daily Caller — From IRS targeting to the PRISM program, the Obama administration has disregarded our most basic freedoms as part of a Nixonian campaign to discredit its political enemies, Sen. Ted Cruz said in a speech Thursday.

“Using the machinery of government to target your political enemies is wrong. It was wrong when Nixon did it, and it’s wrong now,” the Texas Republican told an audience at the Faith and Freedom Coalition.

Cruz characterized the nation’s current disagreements over religious freedom as part of an unbroken struggle waged since the days of the pilgrims.

Citing Obamacare’s birth control mandate for hospitals, Cruz declared, “the government has no business ordering Americans to contravene their faith.”

Cruz also expressed concern over possible violations of Americans’ privacy after revelations of secret phone and internet surveillance on a massive scale by the National Security Agency. He deplored efforts to ignore constitutional privacy rights and violate the Fourth Amendment.

“We have to protect our constitutional rights and our Fourth Amendment rights as law-abiding citizens. And security should not be an excuse for the federal government to violate the constitutional rights of American citizens.”

When asked about Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein and HouseSpeaker John Boehner’s public accusations of treason against NSA leaker Edward Snowden, Cruz stated that Snowden may have done a great public service for the American people:

“It depends on what the facts are. It depends what specific policy it is. It also depends on who Mr. Snowden, who he is, what his motives are, and what exactly his conduct was. If it is the case of the administration having place a program that is violating the constitutional rights of American Citizens, Mr. Snowden drew that to everyone’s attention — then he may well have done an important public service.”

However, the freshman senator later told The Daily Caller that there should not be a rush for judgment due to speculation over Mr. Snowden’s actions.

“At the same time, if it is the case that he was operating from malicious motives, if it’s the case he defects to a foreign nation as there has been some press speculation that he might, if it is the case that his disclosure have damaged US national security — then there are consequences violating the law. And I think we should not rush to judgement until we know what the facts are,” Cruz told TheDC.

“I think we need to determine what exactly the Obama administration’s policy has been,” Cruz continued. “We don’t know. There have been a lot of questions raised by this so called whistle-blower. And right now, the Obama administration is essentially saying, ‘Trust us’.”

At the same time, Cruz highlighted the administration’s failure to prevent multiple terrorist attacks on American citizens.

“One of the unfortunate failures of the Obama administration is that they demonstrated over and over again that when we have specific credible intelligence on terrorists, they dropped the ball and the result has been catastrophic terrorist attacks that have claimed innocent lives.”

According to the tea party favorite, after a litany of scandals the current administration has lost the trust of the American people.

“Unfortunately, the trust and credibility of this administration has been seriously diminished,” Cruz said, “by the abuses we have seen with the IRS, with Benghazi, with the secretary of Health and Human Services trying to shake down the companies she regulates. And so before we determine how to fix the current policy — we need to determine what that is. There is no doubt that the United States needs to be vigorous [in] going after radical Islamic terrorists.”

Sen. Ted Cruz Tells Eric Bolling, Abolish the IRS
...and Much, Much More


» Full Article

» The Daily Caller
» William Green and Sarah Harvard | Article Archive
» Follow Sarah on Twitter
» Follow William on Twitter


Other Breaking News Items On The Daily Caller

» If The GOP Is This Stupid, It Deserves To Die
The GOP effort to win over Hispanic voters by pushing amnesty is insane and won't work.

» Republicans' Orwellian Doublespeak On Immigration
Some GOPers are arguing that by not granting amnesty to illegal aliens, we are granting them amnesty.

» GINNI THOMAS: Six Big Problems With The Immigration Bill From Someone Who Has Actually Read It
The former Democrat is experienced at reading large bills the Congress seems inclined to pass without reading, such as Obamacare. She tabs them, underlines them and tries to see the big picture of what will happen if the provisions of the bill are implemented.

Thursday, March 28, 2013

eNEWS FOR THE WEEK OF MARCH 26, 2013





K-House eNews — For almost twenty years there has been controversy over certain eyewitness reports of abandoned World War II bases here in the US being retrofitted and restored by the federal government. Such bases were confirmed to exist, although, since the government was not acknowledging them, their ultimate purpose was elusive.

A skeptical perspective (maybe paranoid) feared that this was for containment of a resistant population reacting to a federal authority which had chosen disregard the Constitution and dissolve personal freedoms. Private militias were form and commenced training. the stock piling of food stuffs and weapons took went ballistic.

Whether this was a rational response or just prudent disaster planning by the Federal Emergence Management Authority (FEMA), a suspicious rift grew between a segment of the population and the federal government.

Now many years later the same issues have resurfaced once more. This time there is many more overt actions by the federal government that need clarification. These issues have become so concerning that Government officials on both sides of the isle have requested enlightenment to the ultimate implied intentions.

According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics data for 2008 there are now 70 different federal law enforcement agencies employing over 120,000 officers that have the authority to carry firearms and arrest. This represents a nearly 30% increase from 2004-2008. This is a staggering number. The consequential increase between 2008-2013 can only be extrapolated because current data is not available.

There are presently 73 Offices of the Inspector General (OIG) attached to different departments of the Federal government. Because the OIG is tasked with not only auditing their respective agency’s actions but uncovering misconduct, fraud and illegal activities, the individual federal agencies have secured the services of fully trained and armed agents dressed and acting as tactical units. Just a few of the agencies so equipped are the State Department, The Department of Education, The Department of Energy, US Fish and Wildlife Services and the National Parks Services. Even NASA as such a team. This might not sound extreme until you recognize that the Constitution of the US forbids a federal police force who’s purpose is to act against its citizens. The federal government only has authority outward, not inward.

If this wasn’t concerning enough now it has come to light that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for the last year has been stockpiling ammunition. Not just a little. So far the estimates are close to 2 BILLION rounds. This amounts to a 24 year supply. Just yesterday it was revealed they have ordered 340,000 more rounds. There are even reports that these are hollow point rounds that are twice as expensive as regular full metal jacket ones. A curious point is that the Geneva Convention on “civilized” war forbids the use of hollow point bullets. Even our military doesn’t use hollow point ammunition.

Several enquiries have been made to DHS about their intentions with this stockpiled inventory. At first they said they were “bulk” buying to save money. When the price issue was presented they became silent. Even the efforts of several Congressmen have to garnered any answers. Pressure is mounting from both sides of the isle for an explanation.

It is said that “nature abhors a vacuum”. With the lack of verifiable information the public is left to “speculate” as to the intentions of the federal government. And speculate it will. With more guns being sold than any time in our country’s history, and ammunition to the general public becoming more restricted because of DHS’s apparent purchasing, frustration and suspicion is growing. The plausible explanations for this type stockpiling drifts to either trying to curtail Second Amendment rights by restricting supply or preparing for an extreme situation of civil unrest. Either explanation is frightening. Either they want to ignore and invalidate the Constitution and/or they want to be equipped for the consequences when they do.

If there is a plausible explanation we the people need to hear it and soon. Otherwise the words of our president, during his first campaign in Colorado, echo in our ears:
“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
» Full Article

Related:
» Congressman Doug Lamalfa On DHS Ammo Purchases - WND
» Congress Seeks Answers on Huge Homeland Security Ammo Contracts - The New American
» While Ammunition Is Hard To Find, Department Of Homeland Security Has Stockpile - Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.

» Koinonia House
» eNews Archive

About Koinonia House & Dr. Chuck Missler
Koinonia is a New Testament word which is most often translated to mean “communication”, “fellowship”, or “communion”. Koinonia House, or K-House as we are affectionately called, is dedicated to the development and distribution of materials for encouraging and facilitating serious study of the Bible as the inerrant Word of God.

K-House was founded by Chuck and Nancy Missler. Chuck, a Naval academy graduate and former Branch Chief of the Dept. of Guided Missiles, had a remarkable 30-year executive career. He served on the Board of Directors of 12 public companies and was CEO of 6 of them. For twenty years Chuck balanced his high-profile corporate career with his teaching commitment to a weekly Bible study at Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa in Southern California. Nancy, while raising their four children, has touched the lives of thousands through her in-depth teaching of Biblical discoveries in her “Way of Agape” and “Be Ye Transformed” books and tape series.

After a devastating earthquake in 1992 demolished their home in Big Bear, California, Chuck and Nan moved Koinonia House to Coeur d’Alene, Idaho and K-House now reaches tens of thousands through its monthly newsletter, radio shows, podcast, Bible study materials, and conferences. More than eight million Bible study resources have been distributed in the U.S. and in over 35 countries around the world. Please join us in this Grand Adventure, and let’s see what the Lord will do.